• © 2000 - 2025 All content on this website is copyrighted and may not be reproduced without consent.
  • TMuscle forum does not sell or endorse any bodybuilding supplements.
    TMuscle has no affiliation with advertisers; they simply purchase advertising space here. If you have questions go to their site and ask them directly.

    Advertisers are responsible for the content in their forums.

    DO NOT SELL ILLEGAL PRODUCTS ON OUR FORUM. IF MEMBERS FIND ANYTHING ILLEGAL PLEASE REPORT IMMEDIATELY FOR PROMPT REMOVAL

    Read Our Forum Terms and Rules
  • TMuscle acknowledges the use of AAS (anabolic and androgenic steroids) POMs (prescription-only medicines) and other performance-enhancing substances in bodybuilding today. It aims to provide reliable information on their safe administration, side effects and dangers.

    TMuscle does not approve or support the unlawful supply, possession or use of any drug.

    Members may report and describe factually their experiences with AAS and brands of AAS and POMs.

    Members may not offer to supply or facilitate the unlawful supply of AAS, POMS or other controlled drugs on TMuscle or its messaging systems.

Carbs Too Low For My Cycle? - Follow Up Thread

Jamesalan said:
Fair enough but I am hypertrophy training and have put on quite a bit of muscle on sarms. They agonise the AR the same way gear does. They also have been trialed rad has been ran up to 150mg a day when the "forum bro", cycle is 15-30mg. I've been moving the scale up while losing fat so idk I'm happy with the results sure I'm not turning into the hulk overnight but at least I'm using my dangerous drugs as they are intended lmao.

Could really make alot of the same arguments for ugl gear. A lot of gear is faked often.
Click to expand...

but UGL test is test. potential contaminants but we know what's what...same for anavar...same for winstrol... some drugs you can even tell by reaction straight away if it is what it is.....not all of course...but id know anadrol or Tren for sure....

SARMS we don't, most weren't approved due to side effects - studies cut short and are without any medical purpose for the most part - legally. So no one is making really SARMS..... legally. big difference IMO and pseudo safety claims so that many who are put off by steroids use thinking they are a lot safer.

long term sides ...no clues... most steroids don't have side effects like altering vision. they are popular due to legal loopholes not effectiveness

if they were better trust me BB would be all over them....they aren't

anyway as mentioned your happy with them so cool. your adult choice :-)
 
noel said:
but UGL test is test. potential contaminants but we know what's what...same for anavar...same for winstrol... some drugs you can even tell by reaction straight away if it is what it is.....not all of course...but id know anadrol or Tren for sure....

SARMS we don't, most weren't approved due to side effects - studies cut short and are without any medical purpose for the most part - legally. So no one is making really SARMS..... legally. big difference IMO and pseudo safety claims so that many who are put off by steroids use thinking they are a lot safer.

long term sides ...no clues... most steroids don't have side effects like altering vision. they are popular due to legal loopholes not effectiveness

if they were better trust me BB would be all over them....they aren't

anyway as mentioned your happy with them so cool. your adult choice :-)
Click to expand...

I agree partially I've stated I'd take a cycle of test over sarms but we are from different countries seems to be easier to find gear there here especially in my area nobody has it besides guys on trt. I've looked but idk if it's fair to say sarms are more or less dangerous as you have said we don't know it's kinda like the cigs vs vape debate vaping is newish compared to cigs no long term studies on it yeah cigs are terrible and will kill you but vaping could potentially be worse who knows.

I'm not having any sides hardly at all rough joints sometimes that's really it, blood pressure being high is nothing to mess with but as you said everyone's adult choice.

Sarms and roids are stupid to take there is not way to say either are completely safe but is anything safe anymore? A guy died at a water drinking contest lol.

I guess we are all just trying to look our best today and yeah 40 years down the line we may regret it that's the risk we are taking.
 
if im taking calculated risks id do it with the stuff which works the best to be fair.

which would be gear... plain test if I wanted to be super safe.....then the other medically approved stuff...primo...GH..... bit of anavar now and then

id be pretty confident that over time would be better than high doses of SARMS...... anyway your bang on its all a risk for sure. so everyone has to weigh that up individually. As we are all different
 
I understand your point, and the cigarette vs vape comparison makes sense in terms of risk perspective. With smoking, the long-term effects are well established, while vaping still carries some uncertainty. I vape myself using products from https://ecigone.co.uk/, and I see it as a different risk profile rather than a direct comparison.

Similarly, when comparing SARMs and traditional compounds, it often comes down to available data. Testosterone and other established compounds have decades of research behind them, making their effects more predictable. SARMs are newer, so long-term outcomes and consistency in real-world use are less clear.

Ultimately, it’s about weighing risks and goals, with predictability being a key factor rather than assuming any option is completely risk-free.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top