Chemclarity - Review

[A1243R]

So @ChemClarity kindly offered to carry out a free test for me for a review on here and UKM.

The whole process couldn't of been any better. Dealing with ChemClarity on emails was nice and easy and they were great with any questions and sorted everything for me.

The sample kit arrived the day after I ordered it so that was great - looked like this:

Nice and simple to do.... draw up 0.5ml with the needle they supply and then squirt into there test vial and post it.

I posted it Monday and had the test results back today.... the tested the GSL Sust 350 for me which I rate highly and think it's a very good product. Unfortunately it ain't what it says it is on the tin! Don't want to slate the lab as it's still got all 4 esters it should have just below the levels they should be!

Overall the experiance was simple and although I didnt lay this time I'll definetely be doing more for £40 a pop.

 

[Hilly]

Ouch the mighty gsl not coming good eh.

Shock. Just like every one else. Circa 200mg gear. I'd still be ok with that

 

[Mr mac]

Are they giving these mg figures based on 1/2ml tho?
I.e. We're the amounts half of these and they have doubled them to show the 1ml amount??

 

[Porky]

Not even 200mg/ml for sust 350?

 

[A1243R]

Are they giving these mg figures based on 1/2ml tho?
I.e. We're the amounts half of these and they have doubled them to show the 1ml amount??

Look at the quanitification section buddy.... it states it per mg/ml

 

[Tommy6]

What could the 3 unknown compounds be?

 

[A1243R]

That's a fairly good point from mac.

That's shit though, I'll send it to em..... See what they have to say.

Answered above mate and already sent it....

 

[A1243R]

What could the 3 unknown compounds be?

Spunk, faney batter and shit?

 

[A1243R]

Ouch the mighty gsl not coming good eh.

Shock. Just like every one else. Circa 200mg gear. I'd still be ok with that

Paying a premium for the Sust though hilly... it's not the cheapest gear and tonne getting 150mg less than you should is taking the piss

 

[Mr mac]

Look at the quanitification section buddy.... it states it per mg/ml

No I get that but why do they only want 1/2ml of liquid. Why not do a ml.
For example I assume based on your 1/2ml results the prop was 9 mg etc. and they double to show per ml??

 

[Mr mac]

That's why I got no pip ha ha

 

[ChemClarity]

What could the 3 unknown compounds be?

In short - anything that falls outside the scope of the test.

We're looking into what they are as we've found that all UGL steroids contain between (roughly) 2-6 unknowns.

@Porky has contributed to this in another thread.

 

[Porky]

No I get that but why do they only want 1/2ml of liquid. Why not do a ml.
For example I assume based on your 1/2ml results the prop was 9 mg etc. and they double to show per ml??

There's no point in sending 10ml

 

[Porky]

Paying a premium for the Sust though hilly... it's not the cheapest gear and tonne getting 150mg less than you should is taking the piss

I think Hilly thinks it's sust 250, not 350

 

[Mr mac]

In short - anything that falls outside the scope of the test.

We're looking into what they are as we've found that all UGL steroids contain between (roughly) 2-6 unknowns.

@Porky has contributed to this in another thread.

Hi guys ive asked this a couple of times. Are you basing the mg per ml amounts of the test shown above by simply doubling the results shown for the half ml you tested. Not that it's of major importance I'm just wondering.